Check My GPCare ratings, made clear
Search by postcode

GP practice · independent evidence profile

Haiderian Medical Centre

181 Corbets Tey Road, Upminster, Essex, RM14 2YN

CQC location 1-589645273NHS organisation code F82002
Current overall CQC ratingGoodAssessment dated 13 April 2026
Active registrationRegistered

Registered from 1 April 2013.

Registered address181 Corbets Tey Road, Upminster, Essex, RM14 2YN

A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.

Responsible health systemNHS North East London Integrated Care Board

ODS code F82002. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.

Location and contact

181 Corbets Tey Road, Upminster, Essex, RM14 2YN

Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.

CQC assessment breakdown

How the service was assessed

These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.

Caring

Good
75%

This service is caring

Effective

Good
75%

This service is effective

Responsive

Outstanding
100%

This service is exceptionally responsive

Safe

Good
75%

This service is safe

Well-led

Good
75%

This service is well-led

Latest published evidence

Ongoing Assessment for Haiderian Medical Centre

Assessment dated 13 April 2026. Published 13 July 2026.

What CQC reported

The service is performing well and meeting our expectations.

People’s experience

As part of our assessment, we reviewed feedback from people who used the service to understand their views and experience of the service. This included speaking with people using the service at the time of our assessment and reviewing other feedback available to us. People we spoke with were very positive about the quality of their care and treatment. They described how staff treated them with kindness and compassion and respected their privacy. This was mirrored in the results of recent surveys, including the 2025 National GP Patient Survey, which showed all feedback was positive and aligned with or above both local and national averages. For example, 95% of people stated their needs were met, and 88% stated they had a good overall experience. The leaders established a targeted “Vulnerable Voices” patient participation group (PPG) to engage underrepresented groups such as patients with a learning disability, severe mental health, dementia, housebound patients, and carers who were asked to complete surveys to enable staff to understand the challenges they experienced when accessing the practice. The feedback from the surveys from carers was positive, and they stated the challenges were access to appointments and continuity of care. In response the practice sent carers invitations to health checks and to improve access ensured they were easily identified by staff on the computer system. To ensure the practice received more feedback from children and young people they had developed a pictorial survey.

GP Patient Survey 2026

What registered patients reported

112 completed questionnaires · 28.9% response rate.

84.4%

Overall experience was good

Confidence interval 78.3%–89.1%
81.1%

Experience of contacting the practice was good

Confidence interval 74.6%–86.3%
99.3%

Last appointment met the patient’s needs

Confidence interval 96.4%–99.9%
95.7%

Healthcare professional was good at listening

Confidence interval 91.5%–97.9%
91.1%

Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern

Confidence interval 85.8%–94.6%
99.3%

Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional

Confidence interval 96.4%–99.9%
93.5%

Reception and administrative team were helpful

Confidence interval 88.8%–96.4%
84.9%

Contacting the practice by phone was easy

Confidence interval 78.8%–89.5%
75.6%

Contacting the practice through its website was easy

Confidence interval 64.1%–84.3%

Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.

Community experiences

Patient reviews of Haiderian Medical Centre

Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.

New

No approved community reviews yet.

Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.

Leave a review

Share your experience

Describe access, communication and staff—not private medical details. Every submission is checked before publication.

Do not include diagnoses, medication, NHS numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, staff surnames or accusations. Reviews are personal experiences, not verified clinical evidence.

Registered scope

Services and regulated activities

Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.

Service types

Doctors/Gps

Regulated activities

Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures

Specialisms

Services for everyone

Published record

Rating and report history

Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.

20 December 2018GoodCQC rating history
17 September 2015GoodCQC rating history

Read this profile carefully

Evidence, not a league table.

CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.

Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.

Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.