Check My GPCare ratings, made clear
Search by postcode

GP practice · independent evidence profile

Wadebridge and Camel Estuary Practice

Brooklyn, Wadebridge, Cornwall, PL27 7BS

CQC location 1-568621975NHS organisation code L82004
Current overall CQC ratingGoodAssessment dated 26 February 2024
Active registrationRegistered

Registered from 1 April 2013.

Registered addressBrooklyn, Wadebridge, Cornwall, PL27 7BS

A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.

Responsible health systemNHS Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Integrated Care Board

ODS code L82004. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.

Location and contact

Brooklyn, Wadebridge, Cornwall, PL27 7BS

Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.

CQC assessment breakdown

How the service was assessed

These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.

Caring

Good
75%

This service is caring

Effective

Good
75%

This service is effective

Responsive

Good
75%

This service is responsive

Safe

Good
75%

This service is safe

Well-led

Good
75%

This service is well-led

Latest published evidence

Ongoing Assessment for Wadebridge and Camel Estuary Practice

Assessment dated 26 February 2024. Published 18 July 2024.

What CQC reported

The service is performing well and meeting our expectations.

People’s experience

Most people spoken with, were happy with access and pleased with the treatment received from the clinician. However, some people expressed concerns around the booking of appointments via the new system and the difficulties with completing the online form. Patients raised concerns regarding the waiting times for non urgent appointments to see a clinician. The practice provided assurances they were addressing concerns and making improvements. For example, improvement of the access of digital technology for accessing/booking appointments and systems/processes to support patients who experienced difficulties with the electronic booking system. Additional face-to-face, telephone and video appointments had been made available. The practice was in the process of employing more nursing staff to meet patient demand.

GP Patient Survey 2026

What registered patients reported

115 completed questionnaires · 36.7% response rate.

76.7%

Overall experience was good

Confidence interval 68.9%–83.1%
68.4%

Experience of contacting the practice was good

Confidence interval 60.1%–75.7%
93.2%

Last appointment met the patient’s needs

Confidence interval 87.5%–96.4%
94.5%

Healthcare professional was good at listening

Confidence interval 89.2%–97.3%
87.5%

Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern

Confidence interval 80.8%–92.1%
97.1%

Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional

Confidence interval 92.7%–98.9%
92.5%

Reception and administrative team were helpful

Confidence interval 86.5%–96%
46.4%

Contacting the practice by phone was easy

Confidence interval 37.6%–55.4%
75.1%

Contacting the practice through its website was easy

Confidence interval 66.3%–82.3%

Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.

Community experiences

Patient reviews of Wadebridge and Camel Estuary Practice

Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.

New

No approved community reviews yet.

Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.

Leave a review

Share your experience

Describe access, communication and staff—not private medical details. Every submission is checked before publication.

Do not include diagnoses, medication, NHS numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, staff surnames or accusations. Reviews are personal experiences, not verified clinical evidence.

Registered scope

Services and regulated activities

Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.

Service types

Doctors/Gps

Regulated activities

Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures

Specialisms

Services for everyone

Published record

Rating and report history

Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.

27 July 2017GoodCQC rating history
4 June 2015GoodCQC rating history

Read this profile carefully

Evidence, not a league table.

CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.

Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.

Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.