Check My GPCare ratings, made clear
Search by postcode

GP practice · independent evidence profile

Cambrian Surgery

Thomas Savin Road, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1GA

CQC location 1-547643526NHS organisation code M82026
Current overall CQC ratingGoodAssessment dated 7 May 2025
Active registrationRegistered

Registered from 1 April 2013.

Registered addressThomas Savin Road, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1GA

A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.

Responsible health systemNHS Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Integrated Care Board

ODS code M82026. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.

Location and contact

Thomas Savin Road, Oswestry, Shropshire, SY11 1GA

Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.

CQC assessment breakdown

How the service was assessed

These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.

Caring

Good
75%

This service is caring

Effective

Good
62%

This service is effective

Responsive

Good
71%

This service is responsive

Safe

Good
62%

This service is safe

Well-led

Good
75%

This service is well-led

Latest published evidence

Ongoing Assessment for Cambrian Surgery

Assessment dated 7 May 2025. Published 18 September 2025.

What CQC reported

The service is performing well and meeting our expectations.

People’s experience

People were positive about the quality of their care and treatment. Recent survey results, including from the National GP Patient Survey 2025 and the NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT), showed people were satisfied with services. Feedback from patients completing the FFT in 2025 showed over 90% of patients would recommend the practice to friends and family. There was an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service. Representatives from the PPG described how managers made positive changes following feedback. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) received 19 completed give feedback on care forms from patients. Nine of these were positive, 2 mixed and 8 were negative. Patient experience at the practice reflected a mix of positive outcomes and areas for improvement. Many patients commended the staff for their compassion, professionalism, and dedication, often going above and beyond to support patients, including those with long-term conditions and additional needs. Patients told us the telephone consultation system worked well for some, with timely callbacks and efficient face-to-face arrangements when necessary. Communication around chronic health monitoring and test follow-ups was also positively noted by several patients. However, concerns were shared regarding access to appointments, particularly via phone, with reports of busy lines, disconnections, and difficulty booking at peak times. Feedback on communication was mixed, and feedback received suggested that a small number of patients sometimes experienced barriers to appropriate care. Reception and administrative staff received both positive and negative feedback, with some patients described a friendly service while others reported a dismissive or inflexible service. Overall, the practice was appreciated by many for its dedicated staff and supportive approach, but would benefit from improving appointment access, communication consistency, and care for more complex or vulnerable patients. Staff described the practice as a friendly, supportive, and well-led workplace with strong teamwork and approachable leadership. They felt valued, appreciated, and committed to delivering high-quality patient care despite rising demand. Regular teaching, open communication, and staff recognition contributed to positive morale and a collaborative culture. Areas for improvement included introducing clearer pay banding for administrative staff, improving internal communication, and involving all teams more in decision-making. Staff also noted the need for more practice nurses and further development of the nursing team. The upcoming total triage model was seen as a welcome step to ease pressure and improve patient access, though successful implementation would require continued support and adaptation.

GP Patient Survey 2026

What registered patients reported

93 completed questionnaires · 27.3% response rate.

83.4%

Overall experience was good

Confidence interval 65.8%–92.9%
65.4%

Experience of contacting the practice was good

Confidence interval 47.1%–80%
96.3%

Last appointment met the patient’s needs

Confidence interval 81.7%–99.3%
88.9%

Healthcare professional was good at listening

Confidence interval 72.1%–96.1%
91.6%

Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern

Confidence interval 75.3%–97.5%
98.3%

Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional

Confidence interval 85%–99.8%
82%

Reception and administrative team were helpful

Confidence interval 64.2%–92%
37.8%

Contacting the practice by phone was easy

Confidence interval 21.7%–57.1%
61.4%

Contacting the practice through its website was easy

Confidence interval 39.2%–79.6%

Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.

Community experiences

Patient reviews of Cambrian Surgery

Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.

New

No approved community reviews yet.

Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.

Leave a review

Share your experience

Describe access, communication and staff—not private medical details. Every submission is checked before publication.

Do not include diagnoses, medication, NHS numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, staff surnames or accusations. Reviews are personal experiences, not verified clinical evidence.

Registered scope

Services and regulated activities

Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.

Service types

Doctors/Gps

Regulated activities

Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures

Specialisms

Services for everyone

Published record

Rating and report history

Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.

25 October 2016GoodCQC rating history
22 June 2016GoodCQC rating history
15 August 2013Published CQC reportSee the official record for the report

Read this profile carefully

Evidence, not a league table.

CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.

Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.

Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.