Check My GPCare ratings, made clear
Search by postcode

GP practice · independent evidence profile

Dr Rachel Ng & partners

9 West Road, Annfield Plain, Stanley, County Durham, DH9 7XT

CQC location 1-543798174NHS organisation code A83073
Current overall CQC ratingGoodAssessment dated 13 November 2025
Active registrationRegistered

Registered from 1 April 2013.

Registered address9 West Road, Annfield Plain, Stanley, County Durham, DH9 7XT

A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.

Responsible health systemNHS North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board

ODS code A83073. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.

Location and contact

9 West Road, Annfield Plain, Stanley, County Durham, DH9 7XT

Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.

CQC assessment breakdown

How the service was assessed

These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.

Caring

Good
75%

This service is caring

Effective

Good
75%

This service is effective

Responsive

Good
75%

This service is responsive

Safe

Good
75%

This service is safe

Well-led

Good
79%

This service is well-led

Latest published evidence

Ongoing Assessment for Dr Rachel Ng & partners

Assessment dated 13 November 2025. Published 8 January 2026.

What CQC reported

The service is performing well and meeting our expectations.

People’s experience

People were positive about the quality of their care and treatment. Recent survey results, including from the National GP Patient Survey and the NHS Friends and Family Test, showed people were satisfied with services. For example, 88% of patients who responded to the National GP Patient survey said they had a good overall experience, compared to an average of 79% across the Integrated Care Board (ICB) area and 75% across England. Patients found it easy to contact this GP practice on the phone, with 72% reporting this, compared to 57% across the ICB and 57% across England. Patients reported they had a good experience at their last appointment with 99% reporting the healthcare professional had all the information they needed about the patient, compared to 93% across the ICB and 92% across England. Patients felt their needs were met, with 96% reporting this, compared to 91% across the ICB and 90% across England. There was an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service. Representatives from the PPG reported back high levels of satisfaction with the service they received.

GP Patient Survey 2026

What registered patients reported

99 completed questionnaires · 27.7% response rate.

94.1%

Overall experience was good

Confidence interval 89.5%–96.8%
95.6%

Experience of contacting the practice was good

Confidence interval 91.3%–97.8%
94%

Last appointment met the patient’s needs

Confidence interval 89.3%–96.8%
91.1%

Healthcare professional was good at listening

Confidence interval 85.9%–94.6%
91.2%

Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern

Confidence interval 86%–94.6%
94.1%

Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional

Confidence interval 89.4%–96.8%
96%

Reception and administrative team were helpful

Confidence interval 91.8%–98.1%
80.7%

Contacting the practice by phone was easy

Confidence interval 74.1%–86%
76.8%

Contacting the practice through its website was easy

Confidence interval 63.9%–86%

Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.

Community experiences

Patient reviews of Dr Rachel Ng & partners

Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.

New

No approved community reviews yet.

Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.

Leave a review

Share your experience

Describe access, communication and staff—not private medical details. Every submission is checked before publication.

Do not include diagnoses, medication, NHS numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, staff surnames or accusations. Reviews are personal experiences, not verified clinical evidence.

Registered scope

Services and regulated activities

Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.

Service types

Doctors/Gps

Regulated activities

Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injuryDiagnostic and screening procedures

Specialisms

Services for everyone

Published record

Rating and report history

Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.

4 February 2016GoodCQC rating history

Read this profile carefully

Evidence, not a league table.

CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.

Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.

Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.