Check My GPCare ratings, made clear
Search by postcode

GP practice · independent evidence profile

Parkwood Surgery

Parkwood Drive, Warners End, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP1 2LD

CQC location 1-539526169NHS organisation code E82091
Current overall CQC ratingRequires improvementAssessment dated 12 February 2025
Active registrationRegistered

Registered from 1 April 2013.

Registered addressParkwood Drive, Warners End, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP1 2LD

A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.

Responsible health systemNHS Central East Integrated Care Board

ODS code E82091. Data refreshed 6 September 2026.

Location and contact

Parkwood Drive, Warners End, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP1 2LD

Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.

CQC assessment breakdown

How the service was assessed

These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.

Caring

Requires Improvement
40%

This service is not always caring

Effective

Requires Improvement
46%

This service is not always effective

Responsive

Inadequate
32%

This service is not responsive

Safe

Requires Improvement
47%

This service is not always safe

Well-led

Requires Improvement
46%

This service is not always well-led

Latest published evidence

Ongoing Assessment for Parkwood Surgery

Assessment dated 12 February 2025. Published 8 April 2026.

What CQC reported

The service is not performing as well as it should and we have told the service how it must improve.

People’s experience

While some people described positive interactions, people’s experience of using the service was largely negative. People reported that care was not reliable, timely or responsive and described struggling to obtain appointments, even when advised to book by a clinician or when their symptoms worsened. The online consultation system often closed early, phone queues were long and appointments released at 8am were usually gone within minutes. As a result, some felt their only option was to queue outside early in the morning, which disproportionately affected the ability of working age adults, carers, older people and those with disabilities or mental health needs to access appointments. People described some staff attitudes as dismissive or unhelpful and said information given by reception staff was inconsistent. Privacy was not always respected. The reception area did not allow for confidential conversations and people reported having to shout personal information through a plastic barrier, staff discussing patient information in public areas and confidential details left visible on desks. People experienced delays in receiving medicines, test results and referrals. Examples included unsigned prescriptions, missing information on urgent medicines for children, and long waits for referrals or hospital letters to be actioned. Some patients reported harm or distress because important clinical information was not reviewed. Continuity of care was poor. People reported seeing different clinicians, experiencing cancelled appointments and receiving conflicting advice, medicines errors and failures to follow up results and care plans. Patients commonly saw different locum clinicians, felt their history was not understood, or were reviewed by staff who they felt were not at the appropriate clinical level. As a result, some people lost confidence in the service and chose to leave the practice after many years. People repeatedly said they did not feel listened to. Complaints often went unanswered or were felt to have been dismissed, and some individuals sought help from their Member of Parliament after being unable to get a response from the practice. Overall, feedback showed the service was not consistently kind, respectful or person centred. Many people felt distressed, dismissed and unsupported. The systemic issues in access, communication, continuity and leadership were directly affecting the quality and safety of care.

GP Patient Survey 2026

What registered patients reported

105 completed questionnaires · 30.3% response rate.

41.8%

Overall experience was good

Confidence interval 27.8%–57.3%
32.5%

Experience of contacting the practice was good

Confidence interval 19.9%–48.2%
84.9%

Last appointment met the patient’s needs

Confidence interval 70.3%–93%
79.5%

Healthcare professional was good at listening

Confidence interval 64.4%–89.3%
77.6%

Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern

Confidence interval 61.9%–88%
85.6%

Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional

Confidence interval 71%–93.6%
54.1%

Reception and administrative team were helpful

Confidence interval 38.5%–68.8%
12.5%

Contacting the practice by phone was easy

Confidence interval 5.3%–26.6%
35.3%

Contacting the practice through its website was easy

Confidence interval 21%–53%

Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.

Community experiences

Patient reviews of Parkwood Surgery

Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.

New

No approved community reviews yet.

Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.

Leave a review

Share your experience

Describe access, communication and staff—not private medical details. Every submission is checked before publication.

Do not include diagnoses, medication, NHS numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, staff surnames or accusations. Reviews are personal experiences, not verified clinical evidence.

Registered scope

Services and regulated activities

Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.

Service types

Doctors/Gps

Regulated activities

Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures

Specialisms

Services for everyone

Published record

Rating and report history

Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.

6 July 2017GoodCQC rating history
24 January 2017GoodCQC rating history

Read this profile carefully

Evidence, not a league table.

CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.

Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.

Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.