Registered from 1 April 2013.
GP practice · independent evidence profile
Dr KM Al-Kaisy Practice
Urswick Medical Centre, Urswick Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM9 6EA
CQC location 1-529661202NHS organisation code F82678
A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.
ODS code F82678. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.
Location and contact
Urswick Medical Centre, Urswick Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM9 6EA
Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.
CQC assessment breakdown
How the service was assessed
These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.
Caring
This service is caring
Effective
This service is effective
Responsive
This service is responsive
Safe
This service is safe
Well-led
This service is well-led
Latest published evidence
Ongoing Assessment for Dr KM Al-Kaisy Practice
Assessment dated 28 May 2026. Published 21 July 2026.
What CQC reported
The service is performing well and meeting our expectations.
People’s experience
As part of our assessment, we reviewed feedback from people who used the service to understand their views and experience of the service. This included speaking with people using the service at the time of our assessment and reviewing other feedback available to us. People were positive about the quality of their care and treatment. They described how staff treated them with kindness and compassion and respected their privacy. This was mirrored in the results of recent surveys, including the 2025 National GP Patient Survey, which showed most people were satisfied with the practice. The practice did not have an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service. The practice demonstrated that they had been campaigning via emails, texts and posters to re-start the PPG, but have had no response. We were given assurances that campaign is ongoing, and efforts will be stepped up with senior staff approaching patients personally to try and establish the group. The practice was able to evidence regular patient surveys used as a tool in the absence of a PPG.
GP Patient Survey 2026
What registered patients reported
108 completed questionnaires · 15.7% response rate.
Overall experience was good
Confidence interval 68.4%–77.7%Experience of contacting the practice was good
Confidence interval 71.4%–80.3%Last appointment met the patient’s needs
Confidence interval 80.8%–88.4%Healthcare professional was good at listening
Confidence interval 69.6%–78.9%Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern
Confidence interval 73.3%–82.2%Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional
Confidence interval 83.9%–90.9%Reception and administrative team were helpful
Confidence interval 75.5%–83.8%Contacting the practice by phone was easy
Confidence interval 69.2%–78.5%Contacting the practice through its website was easy
Confidence interval 41.7%–59.6%Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.
Community experiences
Patient reviews of Dr KM Al-Kaisy Practice
Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.
New
No approved community reviews yet.
Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.Registered scope
Services and regulated activities
Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.
Service types
Doctors/Gps
Regulated activities
Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures
Specialisms
Services for everyone
Published record
Rating and report history
Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.
13 August 2019GoodCQC rating history
9 July 2018Requires improvementCQC rating history
12 July 2017Inspected but not ratedCQC rating history
6 September 2016Requires improvementCQC rating history
Read this profile carefully
Evidence, not a league table.
CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.
Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.
Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.