Registered from 5 August 2022.
GP practice · independent evidence profile
Millbarn Medical Centre
Beaconsfield Medical Centre, Walkwood Rise, Beaconsfield, HP9 1TX
CQC location 1-13506230252NHS organisation code K82011
A registered address may be where care is managed rather than delivered.
ODS code K82011. Data refreshed 31 August 2026.
Location and contact
Beaconsfield Medical Centre, Walkwood Rise, Beaconsfield, HP9 1TX
Use the provider website or telephone number to confirm opening times, services and whether this is the place where care is delivered.
CQC assessment breakdown
How the service was assessed
These are CQC key-question results for this location. A percentage is shown only where CQC publishes one.
Caring
This service is exceptionally caring
Effective
This service is effective
Responsive
This service is exceptionally responsive
Safe
This service is safe
Well-led
This service is exceptionally well-led
Latest published evidence
Ongoing Assessment for Millbarn Medical Centre
Assessment dated 10 November 2025. Published 18 March 2026.
What CQC reported
The service is performing exceptionally well.
People’s experience
Patients were consistently positive about how they accessed care and treatment and the overall quality of the care they received. Specifically, feedback sourced from the National GP Patient Survey regarding access and patient experience was higher when compared to local and national averages. For example, in 2025: • 80% of respondents found it easy to get through to the practice by telephone. This was significantly higher when compared to the local average (54%) and the national average (53%). • 89% of respondents described their overall experience of the practice as good. This was significantly higher when compared to the local average (76%) and the national average (75%). The practice promoted and monitored patient feedback that was collected via the NHS ‘Friends and Family’ Test results. We reviewed the most recent responses collected and verified from November 2025 (183 responses), December 2025 (184 responses) and January 2026 (186 responses). Using the combined responses from the last 3 months, 95% rated the service received at the practice as either ‘Good’ or ‘Very Good’. We spoke with the manager from a local care home who had 36 of their residents registered with the practice. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive regarding the practice providing a caring, compassionate and accessible service through weekly ward rounds. Feedback highlighted the visiting teams were proactive, engaging, extremely attentive, kind and provided excellent care and support. Further feedback highlighted the continuity of care and the long-standing positive relationships between the practice, the care home and the residents. We received feedback from patients as a result of the practice sharing information and the direct website link to ‘CQC Give Feedback on Care’ to patients, which was all positive. Patients gave examples of staff being kind, compassionate and problem solvers. Feedback highlighted many examples of practice staff providing exceptional levels of person-centred care and being empowered as a partner in their care. Further comments referred to examples of staff members showing determination and creativity to overcome obstacles to deliver care. This indicated that, a caring, helpful and listening culture was embedded within the practice. There was an active patient participation group (PPG) with 7 core members who represented the views of people using the practice. We spoke with representatives from the PPG, and they described the strong relationship between the practice and the PPG, and how the practice encouraged, respected and valued their involvement. They explained that the relationship was proactive, providing a forum to discuss issues important to patients which were then shared with the practice team. The meetings provided an environment for discussions and agreements about the practice and services provided and members were encouraged to contribute their views and suggestions. The PPG provided various examples of working together with the practice, they felt fully involved and were active in the co-design of the current appointment and triage system and influenced changes for the new premises which led to the relocation in 2022. This included suggestions for accessible furniture to be added to the waiting areas which we saw the practice had implemented. Given the successful use of online and digital access, we heard how the PPG engaged with the local Integrated Care Board (responsible for planning and commissioning local health services, managing NHS budgets, and improving population health within specific areas) to embed similar tools across the local health system, using the practice as a potential blueprint for online access. The representatives we spoke to also shared feedback from a patient’s perspective, this was highly positive, highlighting the benefits of the triage system, the clinical skill mix and the brand-new building and facilities.
GP Patient Survey 2026
What registered patients reported
97 completed questionnaires · 27.5% response rate.
Overall experience was good
Confidence interval 85.2%–96.7%Experience of contacting the practice was good
Confidence interval 81.9%–94.9%Last appointment met the patient’s needs
Confidence interval 88.6%–98.3%Healthcare professional was good at listening
Confidence interval 86.3%–97.4%Healthcare professional treated the patient with care and concern
Confidence interval 91.2%–99.3%Patient had confidence and trust in the healthcare professional
Confidence interval 90.4%–99%Reception and administrative team were helpful
Confidence interval 83.6%–96%Contacting the practice by phone was easy
Confidence interval 71.3%–89.2%Contacting the practice through its website was easy
Confidence interval 71.9%–89.6%Survey percentages are weighted official statistics and describe the people who responded; they are not a Check My GP score or ranking. Results based on small numbers may be suppressed by the survey publisher.
Community experiences
Patient reviews of Millbarn Medical Centre
Personal reviews are moderated and shown separately from official CQC findings and the GP Patient Survey.
New
No approved community reviews yet.
Be the first to share a useful, factual experience.Registered scope
Services and regulated activities
Labels below come from the CQC location record and do not confirm current appointment availability.
Service types
Doctors/Gps
Regulated activities
Maternity and midwifery servicesFamily planningTreatment of disease, disorder or injurySurgical proceduresDiagnostic and screening procedures
Specialisms
Services for everyone
Published record
Rating and report history
Use the official CQC record for complete reports, regulatory action and any changes after our last refresh.
16 March 2017GoodCQC rating history
14 September 2016GoodCQC rating history
Read this profile carefully
Evidence, not a league table.
CQC findings and GP Patient Survey results answer different questions and may cover different time periods. Neither confirms current appointment availability, NHS acceptance, opening hours or whether a provider is suitable for you.
Check the provider’s own website and the complete official CQC record before making a decision. If you need urgent medical help, use NHS 111 or call 999 in an emergency.
Independent lookup: Check My GP is not affiliated with the CQC, NHS or this provider. Providers cannot pay to change their rating or position. CQC data is reused under the Open Government Licence; GP Patient Survey results are published by NHS England and Ipsos.